Elk camp '08 was a sucess...
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Ideeho
Elk camp '08 was a sucess...
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Friday, October 03, 2008
VICTORY FOR STREAM ACCESS
Judge rules public can access rivers from county bridges
By Nick Gevock - Montana Standard - 10/03/08
BUTTE — A judge ruled this week that the public has the right to get to rivers from county bridges, but also determined landowners can attach fences to bridges in a split decision on a 4-year-old case out of Madison County.District Judge Loren Tucker said in a case filed by the nonprofit Public Lands Access Association against Madison County that county road rights of way remain 60 feet wide across rivers. That means the public can use bridges to get to public waters under Montana’s stream access law.James Kennedy, a Ruby Valley landowner and billionaire heir to a media fortune from Atlanta, Ga., an intervener in the case, and whose fences prompted the lawsuit, had argued that county rights of way narrow down to the actual bridge surface. He contended the land below the bridges was private property and therefore the public was trespassing when it crossed fences built up to a bridge.Tucker soundly rejected that.“His implicit argument is that a county road may not be utilized in the vicinity of water,” Tucker said. “That argument is unsupported by authority or by logic.”John Gibson, PLAA president, called the decision a major victory for Montanans.
= 1209358800) && (nAdsysTime = 1221109200) && (nAdsysTime
“It destroys some of the arguments that these people have made regarding the width of the right of way,” he said. “The judge has definitely proven that access to the stream is a legal activity.”The ruling is the latest salvo in a legal fight that has dragged on for longer than four years.PLAA filed the lawsuit against Madison County in May 2004. The group blamed officials for allowing Kennedy to attach fences to bridges that were clearly meant to keep people from getting to the river.Kennedy sued the county as well after it passed a policy allowing the fences in return for an access at each bridge. He later dropped that suit and the county rescinded its policy.But Kennedy, Hamilton Ranches, Inc. and the Montana Stockgrowers’ Association intervened in defense of the county in the PLAA case.Kennedy argued that not every bridge is safe for the public to access and landowners could be held liable if someone was injured while trying to get to a stream. His lawyer in the case, Lance Lovell of Billings, could not be reached for comment Thursday, nor could a representative from the stockgrowers.Madison County Commissioner Dave Schulz said he had only briefly read the ruling. But he added Tucker’s compromise sounded familiar to county officials.“The result of Judge Tucker’s findings remind me an awful lot of Madison County’s initial proposal to guarantee access from bridges and still allow fences in the right of way,” he said.Tucker rejected PLAA’s assertion that a fence is an encroachment. In doing so, Tucker cited a deposition from Tony Schoonen, a group member from Butte, who said that new wooden fences put up by Kennedy did not impede access to the river.His ruling applied to Duncan District Road and Lewis Lane, two county roads historically established by prescriptive easement, but left out Seyler Lane because it hasn’t been established how it was created.Devlan Geddes, a Bozeman lawyer representing PLAA, said the issue with Seyler Lane still needs to be decided in court. Yet, he said the decision on the other two roads is an important precedent that reaffirms and clarifies a 2000 Montana attorney general’s opinion that said rivers could be accessed from public bridges.Allen Chronister, a Helena lawyer representing Madison County, argued in the case that if fences were encroachments, every driveway, railroad and utility pole would be as well. He said from the county’s perspective it was a good decision.“My goal for the county was to try to preserve their right to be able to allow fencing if that was deemed in the public’s interest,” he said. “It was a good result for the issues that the county was facing.”
By Nick Gevock - Montana Standard - 10/03/08
BUTTE — A judge ruled this week that the public has the right to get to rivers from county bridges, but also determined landowners can attach fences to bridges in a split decision on a 4-year-old case out of Madison County.District Judge Loren Tucker said in a case filed by the nonprofit Public Lands Access Association against Madison County that county road rights of way remain 60 feet wide across rivers. That means the public can use bridges to get to public waters under Montana’s stream access law.James Kennedy, a Ruby Valley landowner and billionaire heir to a media fortune from Atlanta, Ga., an intervener in the case, and whose fences prompted the lawsuit, had argued that county rights of way narrow down to the actual bridge surface. He contended the land below the bridges was private property and therefore the public was trespassing when it crossed fences built up to a bridge.Tucker soundly rejected that.“His implicit argument is that a county road may not be utilized in the vicinity of water,” Tucker said. “That argument is unsupported by authority or by logic.”John Gibson, PLAA president, called the decision a major victory for Montanans.
= 1209358800) && (nAdsysTime = 1221109200) && (nAdsysTime
“It destroys some of the arguments that these people have made regarding the width of the right of way,” he said. “The judge has definitely proven that access to the stream is a legal activity.”The ruling is the latest salvo in a legal fight that has dragged on for longer than four years.PLAA filed the lawsuit against Madison County in May 2004. The group blamed officials for allowing Kennedy to attach fences to bridges that were clearly meant to keep people from getting to the river.Kennedy sued the county as well after it passed a policy allowing the fences in return for an access at each bridge. He later dropped that suit and the county rescinded its policy.But Kennedy, Hamilton Ranches, Inc. and the Montana Stockgrowers’ Association intervened in defense of the county in the PLAA case.Kennedy argued that not every bridge is safe for the public to access and landowners could be held liable if someone was injured while trying to get to a stream. His lawyer in the case, Lance Lovell of Billings, could not be reached for comment Thursday, nor could a representative from the stockgrowers.Madison County Commissioner Dave Schulz said he had only briefly read the ruling. But he added Tucker’s compromise sounded familiar to county officials.“The result of Judge Tucker’s findings remind me an awful lot of Madison County’s initial proposal to guarantee access from bridges and still allow fences in the right of way,” he said.Tucker rejected PLAA’s assertion that a fence is an encroachment. In doing so, Tucker cited a deposition from Tony Schoonen, a group member from Butte, who said that new wooden fences put up by Kennedy did not impede access to the river.His ruling applied to Duncan District Road and Lewis Lane, two county roads historically established by prescriptive easement, but left out Seyler Lane because it hasn’t been established how it was created.Devlan Geddes, a Bozeman lawyer representing PLAA, said the issue with Seyler Lane still needs to be decided in court. Yet, he said the decision on the other two roads is an important precedent that reaffirms and clarifies a 2000 Montana attorney general’s opinion that said rivers could be accessed from public bridges.Allen Chronister, a Helena lawyer representing Madison County, argued in the case that if fences were encroachments, every driveway, railroad and utility pole would be as well. He said from the county’s perspective it was a good decision.“My goal for the county was to try to preserve their right to be able to allow fencing if that was deemed in the public’s interest,” he said. “It was a good result for the issues that the county was facing.”
Sunday, September 28, 2008
More carnage
Once again, the fun didn't last long. 40 minutes into the first evening on my stand here comes this doe. Didn't see much point in passing up a shot at ten yards! All that kitchen window scouting really paid off....
Sunday, September 21, 2008
Saturday, September 13, 2008
Whammy!
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Taking Camping to the Next Level



Yep, we did it. We broke down and bought a camper. It will be very nice on those lovely spring Lochsa weekends to have a warm, dry, and comfortable place to sleep, feed and change Jr., and make coffee if it is that nasty out. I might also be able to find a use or two for it during hunting season.... Speaking of which, shouldn't some of you archery hunters out there be posting some photos soon.
Being that I don't bow hunt, I'm going fishing!
Sunday, August 24, 2008
HAPPY 98TH

Miles Davis Coleman turned 14 years old today....that would be 98 in dog years. He's had 6 months to live for the last ten years. Somehow this dog has survived and retreived more birds, and squeaked more in a blind than any other dog that I have known. Anyone that ever hunted over him would say that he was OK, but that was when he could see and hear. No matter what the conditions, he was a hunter, a great companion, and a friend.
He's survived forestry, pipelining, and everything else. A good dog is hard to find, and Miles has set a high bar. Cheers to you Miles!!!!
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Wednesday, August 06, 2008
The usual suspects
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Angry River
The river was angry that day my friends. Boiling and seething like a serpant looking for an unwilling victim. I started the voyage giving Jessie shit for flipping his raft the prior weekend. Cracking beer, and facing the onslaught of the afternoon headwind on the canyon we made our course. Just before the intimidating shadows of triple bridges, I instruct Robs girlfriend to quit putting empty beer cans back in the cooler. My river experience instructs her, "its too hard to find the full ones, throw them in the raft, it's not like we're going the flip." We continue on through the bridges, like gods watching us from the heavens, we passed underneath.
Tumbleweed looked boily and frothy from around the bend. Just upon coming into the monster, Doc's boat cuts in front of us and we bump off line. I know my level of skill would get us through just fine as I reflect, you'd have to be way off to flip in this. Next is Fang. 5 to 6 miller lites into the trip, worries of carnage were farthest from my thoughts. I yell to Jessie, " have you ever taken the middle? this is the last rapid and I'm feeling brave." Robs girlfriend asks, please don't take the chance, "I don't want to get wet". I throttle back, and drift into the easy, predictable right line then flush center into one big wave. I maintain some ego and catch some froth outside the green tounge for fun. No problem, perfectly center I push forward into the one big wave. We crest the wave with perfect timing, not a drop comes over the bow. I must admit I was disappointed about the ease of that run. Just behind the big wave is a smaller slightly right lateral. I let off the oars with no fear, notice the boat quickly turn right, and decided for a split second to not push or straighten out knowing we're through and...WAMMO.
No highside, no "holy shit", just bam we're in the river. 1st flip ever.
No highside, no "holy shit", just bam we're in the river. 1st flip ever.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



















